Maud Mouginot

Maud Mouginot

she/her

Evolutionary Anthropologist & French Science-fiction Author

Postdoctoral associtate at Boston University.

Member of The Omo Valley Research Project and secretary of the Société Francophone de Primatologie.

Publications

You can also find my articles on my Google Scholar profile.

Journal Articles

Differences in expression of male aggression between wild bonobos and chimpanzees.

Published in Current Biology, 2024

Researchers investigating the evolution of human aggression look to our closest living relatives, bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), as valuable sources of comparative data. Males in the two species exhibit contrasting patterns: male chimpanzees sexually coerce females and sometimes kill conspecifics, whereas male bonobos exhibit less sexual coercion and no reported killing. Among the various attempts to explain these species differences, the self-domestication hypothesis proposes negative fitness consequences of male aggression in bonobos. Nonetheless, the extent to which these species differ in overall rates of aggression remains unclear due to insufficiently comparable observation methods. We used 14 community-years of focal follow data—the gold standard for observational studies—to compare rates of male aggression in 3 bonobo communities at the Kokolopori Bonobo Reserve, Democratic Republic of Congo, and 2 chimpanzee communities at Gombe National Park, Tanzania. As expected, given that females commonly outrank males, we found that bonobos exhibited lower rates of male-female aggression and higher rates of female-male aggression than chimpanzees. Surprisingly, we found higher rates of male-male aggression among bonobos than chimpanzees even when limiting analyses to contact aggression. In both species, more aggressive males obtained higher mating success. Although our findings indicate that the frequency of male-male aggression does not parallel species difference in its intensity, they support the view that contrary to male chimpanzees, whose reproductive success depends on strong coalitions, male bonobos have more individualistic reproductive strategies.

Recommended citation: Mouginot, M., Wilson, M.L., Desai, N., Surbeck, M. (2024). Differences in expression of male aggression between wild bonobos and chimpanzees. Current Biology. 34, 1–6.
Download Paper

Reproductive inequality among males in the genus Pan

Published in Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 2023

Reproductive inequality, or reproductive skew, drives natural selection, but has been difficult to assess, particularly for males in species with promiscuous mating and slow life histories, such as bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Although bonobos are often portrayed as more egalitarian than chimpanzees, genetic studies have found high male reproductive skew in bonobos. Here, we discuss mechanisms likely to affect male reproductive skew in Pan, then re-examine skew patterns using paternity data from published work and new data from the Kokolopori Bonobo Reserve, Democratic Republic of Congo and Gombe National Park, Tanzania. Using the multinomial index (M), we found considerable overlap in skew between the species, but the highest skew occurred among bonobos. Additionally, for two of three bonobo communities, but no chimpanzee communities, the highest ranking male had greater siring success than predicted by priority-of-access. Thus, an expanded dataset covering a broader demographic range confirms that bonobos have high male reproductive skew. Detailed comparison of data from Pan highlights that reproductive skew models should consider male-male dynamics including the effect of between-group competition on incentives for reproductive concessions, but also female grouping patterns and factors related to male-female dynamics including the expression of female choice.

Recommended citation: Mouginot M., Cheng L., Feldblum, J.T., Gilby, I., Pusey, A., Städele V., Wroblewski, E., Wilson, M.L., Surbeck, M. (2023). Reproductive inequality among males in the genus Pan. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 378: 20220301.
Download Paper